Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?
Abstract
The relationship of managerial experience to gender and attractiveness biases was examined in decisions involving suitability for hire and probable organizational progression within a typical financial institution. Each of 112 managers evaluated 4 equivalent résumé-data sheets, to which different candidate photographs were attached. The photographs were varied using a 2 X 2 (Gender X Attractiveness) design wherein each photograph depicted a woman or a man who was either highly attractive or slightly below average in attractiveness. For both ratings and rankings of candidates, clear evidence of attractiveness and gender biases were present. The extent of the bias was generally smaller for the most experienced managers, although less attractive female applicants were routinely at a disadvantage regardless of managerial experience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities.
“Moreover, our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities [90–93].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 60 · Cited by 393
- Authors
- Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E.
- ORCID
- Schneider, Sandra L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Psychology
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-21
- ISSN
- 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1854
- OpenAlex
- W2145124617
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- gender bias, attractiveness bias, hiring decisions, managerial experience, resume evaluation, female applicants, financial institutions, personnel selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review