Cited by 393Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchGender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup Psychology

Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?

Marlowe, Cynthia M., Schneider, Sandra L., Nelson, Carnot E.·1996·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The relationship of managerial experience to gender and attractiveness biases was examined in decisions involving suitability for hire and probable organizational progression within a typical financial institution. Each of 112 managers evaluated 4 equivalent résumé-data sheets, to which different candidate photographs were attached. The photographs were varied using a 2 X 2 (Gender X Attractiveness) design wherein each photograph depicted a woman or a man who was either highly attractive or slightly below average in attractiveness. For both ratings and rankings of candidates, clear evidence of attractiveness and gender biases were present. The extent of the bias was generally smaller for the most experienced managers, although less attractive female applicants were routinely at a disadvantage regardless of managerial experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.11

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities.

    “Moreover, our results are supportive of previously reported examples of gender-based discrimination and the challenges faced by women in various spheres of life, including education and professional opportunities [90–93].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 393

Authors
Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1996-02
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2145124617
Cited by
393
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
gender bias, attractiveness bias, hiring decisions, managerial experience, resume evaluation, female applicants, financial institutions, personnel selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review