A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity.

Huffcutt, Allen I., Roth, Philip L., McDaniel, Michael A.·1996·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to explore the extent to which employment in-terview evaluations reflect cognitive ability. A meta-analysis of 49 studies found a cor-rected mean correlation of.40 between interview ratings and ability test scores, suggest-ing that on average about 16 % of the variance in interview constructs represents cognitive ability. Analysis of several design characteristics that could moderate the relationship between interview scores and ability suggested that (a) the correlation with ability tends to decrease as the level of structure increases; (b) the type of questions asked can have considerable influence on the magnitude of the correlation with ability; (c) the reflection of ability in the ratings tends to increase when ability test scores are made available to interviewers; and (d) the correlation with ability generally is higher for low-complexity jobs. Moreover, results suggest that interview ratings that correlate higher with cognitive ability tend to be better predictors of job performance. Implications for incremental va-lidity are discussed, and recommendations for selection strategies are outlined. Understanding of the validity of the employment in-terview has increased considerably in recent years. In particular, a series of meta-analyses has affirmed that the interview is generally a much better predictor of perfor-mance than previously thought and is comparable with many other selection techniques (Huffcutt & Arthur,

Cited by (12)

  1. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings.
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 1998 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review
    Judge, Timothy A., Bono, Joyce E., Ilies, Remus, Gerhardt, Megan W. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis.
    Judge, Timothy A., Heller, Daniel, Mount, Michael K. · 2002 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  4. Generational Differences in Work-Related Attitudes: A Meta-analysis
    Costanza, David P., Badger, Jessica M., Fraser, Rebecca L., Severt, Jamie B., Gade, Paul A. · 2012 · Journal of Business and Psychology
  5. The Incremental Validity of Psychological Testing and Assessment: Conceptual, Methodological, and Statistical Issues.
    Hunsley, John, Meyer, Gregory J. · 2003 · Psychological Assessment

See all 184

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.81.5.459
The paper
Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.81.5.459

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.