Relationship of education and IQ in the WAIS—R standardization sample.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Greater exposure to formal education is associated with higher scores on cognitive tests.
“for example, greater exposure to formal education is associated with higher scores (Brinch & Galloway, 2012;Matarazzo & Herman, 1984).”
From ‘National IQ’ datasets do not provide accurate, unbiased or comparable measures of cognitive ability worldwide (2022) · cites this paper as Matarazzo & Herman, 1984
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Damiani, S., Donadeo, A., Bassetti, N., Salazar‐de‐Pablo, G., Guiot, C., Politi, P., & Fusar‐Poli, P. (2022) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13338 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matarazzo, J. D., & Herman, D. O.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1984-08
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 631-634
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2030687385
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- education, IQ, WAIS-R, standardization sample, educational attainment, intelligence testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
