Cited by 171Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCultural Differences and ValuesPsychology and Mental Health

Thai and American perspectives on over- and undercontrolled child behavior problems: Exploring the threshold model among parents, teachers, and psychologists

Weisz, John R., Suwanlert, Somsong, Chaiyasit, Wanchai, Weiss, Bahr, Walter, Bernadette R., Anderson, Wanni Wibulswasdi·1988·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

When a child has psychological problems, what determines whether adults will consider the problems serious or whether they will seek professional help? One determinant may be cultural: Prevailing social values may help set adult thresholds for concern over child problems. We explored this possibility, comparing adults in Thailand and the United States, two countries where social values and perspectives on childhood differ markedly. Thai and American parents, teachers, and clinical psychologists made judgments about two children, one with overcontrolled problems (e.g., shyness, fear) and one with undercontrolled problems (e.g., disobedience, fighting). Consistent with some of the literature on Thai Buddhist values, Thais (compared with Americans) rated problems of both types as less serious, less worrisome, less likely to reflect personality traits, and more likely to improve with time. Cross-national differences in perceived seriousness were more pronounced for parents and teachers than for psychologists, suggesting that professional culture may mitigate the effects of national culture. Evidently, adults' judgments about child clinical problems can differ markedly as a function of their cultural context. So much of our research on psychopathology is based in the West, particularly in North America, that we risk what Kennedy, Scheirer, and Rogers (1984) called a monocultural science. This risk is significant because research on psychopathology is both the study of the actual behavior of individuals and the study of the lens through which society views that behavior. Because identical behavior is often viewed differently in different societies, judgments about whether a particular behavior pattern represents a serious problem or pathology may be shaped by the cultural context in which the behavior occurs. This phenomenon warrants special attention in research on child psychopathology. In contrast to adults, children rarely consider themselves disturbed and rarely refer themselves for treatment. Instead, parents, teachers, and mental health professionals play these roles, serving, in effect, as gatekeepers to child mental health care. Consequently, the degree of distress adults

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.56.4.601

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cultural differences in interpretations of the severity and longevity of youth mental health problems are known to vary between cultural groups, potentially contributing to different thresholds for whether youth problems are of sufficient severity to require formal intervention.

    “Cultural differences in interpretations of the severity and longevity of youth mental health problems are known to vary between cultural groups, potentially contributing to different thresholds for whether youth problems are of sufficient severity to require formal intervention.”
  • Caregivers are important gatekeepers to youth MHS as their odds of seeking help for their youth are influenced by the degree of strain they experience from their child's emotional and/or behavioral problems.

    “Caregivers are important gatekeepers to youth MHS as their odds of seeking help for their youth are influenced by the degree of strain they experience from their child’s emotional and/or behavioral problems.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 171

Authors
Weisz, J. R., Suwanlert, S., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Walter, B. R., & Anderson, W. W.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1988-08
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
601-609
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2109806407
Cited by
171
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (5 501 MH38240)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
child behavior problems, overcontrol, undercontrol, threshold model, cultural differences, cross-national comparison, parents, teachers, psychologists, child psychopathology, shyness, disobedience
MeSH terms
Aggression, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Rearing, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Psychology, Clinical, Teaching, Thailand, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review