Cited by 117Hemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersPediatric Pain Management TechniquesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Sickle cell disease pain: II. Predicting health care use and activity level at 9-month follow-up.

Gil, Karen M., Abrams, Mary R., Phillips, George, Williams, David A.·1992·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

This study examined 9-month follow-up data obtained from adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) participating in a longitudinal study of pain-coping strategies. Of 99 subjects completing the baseline assessment of pain-coping strategies, 89 (90%) completed a structured pain interview assessing health care use and activity reduction during painful episodes over the follow-up period. Regression analyses controlling for demographics and disease severity revealed that baseline Negative Thinking and Passive Adherence was associated with greater activity reduction and more frequent health care contacts during the subsequent 9 months. Additional correlational analyses revealed that if levels of Negative Thinking and Passive Adherence increased from baseline to follow-up, this increase was associated with even further reductions in activity level during painful episodes. Changes in disease severity were not associated with any of the follow-up measures. Comparing pain-coping strategies assessed at baseline to pain-coping strategies measured at follow-up revealed that, without intervention, pain-coping strategies were relatively stable over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.60.2.267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 117

Authors
Gil, K. M., Abrams, M. R., Phillips, G., & Williams, D. A.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1992
Volume
60
Issue
2
Pages
267-273
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2166553277
Cited by
117
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29hl039124-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (IR29 HL39124-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
sickle cell disease, pain, pain coping, negative thinking, health care utilization, activity reduction, disease severity, adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anemia, Sickle Cell, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hemoglobin SC Disease, Humans, Male, Pain, Referral and Consultation, Sick Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review