Cited by 682Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental Health

Psychiatric disorder in a birth cohort of young adults: Prevalence, comorbidity, clinical significance, and new case incidence from ages 11 to 21.

Newman, Denise L., Moffitt, Terrie E., Caspi, Avshalom, Magdol, Lynn, Silva, Phil A., Stanton, Warren R.·1996·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Mental health data were gathered at ages 11, 13, 15, 18, and 21 in an epidemiological sample using standardized diagnostic assessments. Prevalence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. revised; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) mental disorders increased longitudinally from late childhood (18%) through mid-(22%) to late-adolescence (41%) and young adulthood (40%). Nearly half of age-21 cases had comorbid diagnoses; and comorbidity was associated with severity of impairment. The incidence of cases with adult onset was only 10.6%: 73.8% of adults diagnosed at age 21 had a developmental history of mental disorder. Relative to new cases, those with developmental histories were more severely impaired and more likely to have comorbid diagnoses. The high prevalence rate and significant impairment associated with a diagnosis of mental disorder suggests that treatment resources need to target the young adult sector of the population. The low new-case incidence in young adulthood, however, suggests that primary prevention and etiological research efforts need to target children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.64.3.552

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 682

Authors
Newman, D. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Magdol, L., Silva, P. A., & Stanton, W. R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1996-06
Volume
64
Issue
3
Pages
552-562
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2062346516
Cited by
682
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 40
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH045070)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental illness, young adults, prevalence, comorbidities, functional disability, adult-onset, developmental history, longitudinal cohort, primary prevention, child and adolescent mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review