Psychiatric disorder in a birth cohort of young adults: Prevalence, comorbidity, clinical significance, and new case incidence from ages 11 to 21.
Abstract
Mental health data were gathered at ages 11, 13, 15, 18, and 21 in an epidemiological sample using standardized diagnostic assessments. Prevalence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. revised; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) mental disorders increased longitudinally from late childhood (18%) through mid-(22%) to late-adolescence (41%) and young adulthood (40%). Nearly half of age-21 cases had comorbid diagnoses; and comorbidity was associated with severity of impairment. The incidence of cases with adult onset was only 10.6%: 73.8% of adults diagnosed at age 21 had a developmental history of mental disorder. Relative to new cases, those with developmental histories were more severely impaired and more likely to have comorbid diagnoses. The high prevalence rate and significant impairment associated with a diagnosis of mental disorder suggests that treatment resources need to target the young adult sector of the population. The low new-case incidence in young adulthood, however, suggests that primary prevention and etiological research efforts need to target children and adolescents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Differences in the correlates and clinical profiles between discrete subtypes in this study provide evidence for the validity of these distinctions.
“Although the frequent crossover of eating disorder subtypes in longitudinal studies of adults37–39 suggests a lack of diagnostic specificity of eating disorder subtypes,40–42 differences in the correlates and clinical profiles between discrete subtypes in our study provide evidence for the validity of these distinctions.”
From Prevalence and Correlates of Eating Disorders in Adolescents: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (2011) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 682
- Authors
- Newman, D. L., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Magdol, L., Silva, P. A., & Stanton, W. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1996-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 552-562
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2062346516
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 14.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH045070)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
- Keywords
- mental illness, young adults, prevalence, comorbidities, functional disability, adult-onset, developmental history, longitudinal cohort, primary prevention, child and adolescent mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, New Zealand, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Cohort Studies, Comorbidity, Incidence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review