The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive–behavioral self-help for binge eating disorder: A controlled effectiveness study.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of 2 methods of administering a cognitive-behavioral self-help program for binge eating disorder. The study was designed to reproduce many of the conditions that apply in settings in which self-help interventions are most relevant. Seventy-two women with binge eating disorder were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions for 12 weeks: pure self-help (PSH), guided self-help (GSH), or a waiting list (WL) control condition (followed by PSH or GSH). They were then followed up for 6 months. Both PSH and GSH had a substantial and sustained impact with almost half the participants ceasing to binge eat. There was little change in the WL condition. Cognitive-behavioral self-help may be of value both as an initial treatment for binge eating disorder and as a form of secondary prevention.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“CBT treatment, delivered as guided or pure self-help interventions, also proved efficacious in the treatment of BED [19].”
From Acceptance and efficacy of a guided internet self-help treatment program for obese patients with binge eating disorder (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“This percentage is comparable to the percentage of abstinence observed with guided self-help books for BED with the less stringent criterion of no binge eating episodes for the last 28 days [19, 20].”
From Acceptance and efficacy of a guided internet self-help treatment program for obese patients with binge eating disorder (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–205 of 205
Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant‐Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26580404
Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant‐Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26580401
Davey, E., Bennett, S. D., Bryant‐Waugh, R., Micali, N., Takeda, A., Alexandrou, A., & Shafran, R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26580407
Kranes, M., Münchenberg, P. S., Thomas, C., Schulz, R. S., Campione, A., & Kreutzberg, A. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01660-4
Online Support Groups and Therapy
Harwood, T. M., & L’Abate, L. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1099-8_5 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, J. C., & Fairburn, C. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 616-623
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2126700240
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- binge eating disorder, guided self-help, treatment effectiveness, women, secondary prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Bulimia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Self-Help Groups, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Logistic Models, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review