The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community-Based Prevention of Marital Dysfunction: Multilevel Modeling of a Randomized Effectiveness Study.
Abstract
This study is a cluster randomized controlled trial of the Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program (PREP; H. J. Markman, S. M. Stanley, & S. L. Blumberg, 2001). Fifty-seven religious organizations (ROs), consisting of 217 newlywed couples, were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 intervention conditions: PREP delivered by university clinicians (U-PREP), PREP delivered by RO clergy (ROPREP), and naturally occurring (NO) marriage preparation. Self-reported relationship satisfaction, negative behavior, and positive behavior were assessed at preintervention, postintervention, and 1-year follow-up. Trajectories of relationship satisfaction showed no change over time and did not differ across conditions. Trajectories of negative behavior for RO-PREP wives showed significantly greater linear declines in comparison with NO trajectories. Trajectories of positive behavior for NO and U-PREP partners showed significant declines compared with RO-PREP trajectories. Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of marital distress prevention programs in community settings are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Of the 38 methodologically most rigorous studies, 35 (92%) reported significant relationships between R/S and greater marital stability [255–265].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [257]
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Missing data: our view of the state of the art
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.2.147 · Cited by 11,638
(1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,252
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings
Shrout, P. E. (1980) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(80)90063-4 · Cited by 6,091
Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data
Verbeke, G. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2294-1_3 · Cited by 3,506
The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children
Amato, P. R. (2000) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01269.x · Cited by 2,931
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1037/0022-006X.56.3.440 · DOI
- Johnson, 2002, Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 baseline statewide survey on marriage and divorce (OKDHS Publication No. S02096).
- Kline, 2004, The Interactional Dimensions Coding System: A global system for couple interactions., 113
- Mai-key, 1985, Facilitating Open Couple Communication, Understanding, and Study (FOCCUS).
- Markman, 2003, Why marriage education can work and how government can be involved: Illustrations from the PREP approach.
- McManus, 1993, Marriage savers.
- Notarius, 1983, Marital agendas protocol., 209
- Olson, 1989, PREPARE, PREPARE-MC, ENRICH inventories
- Ooms, 1998, Toward more perfect unions: Putting marriage on the public agenda.
- Prado, 1999, Unearthing the seeds of marital distress: What we have learned from married and remarried couples., 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423
Handbook of Religion and Health
Koenig, H. G., VanderWeele, T. J., & Peteet, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190088859.001.0001 · Cited by 1,160
Patterns of Change in Marital Satisfaction Over the Newlywed Years
Lavner, J. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (2010) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00757.x · Cited by 319
Blanchard, V. L., Hawkins, A. J., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2009) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015211 · Cited by 262
Relationship Education Research: Current Status and Future Directions
Markman, H. J., & RHOADES, G. K. (2012) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00247.x · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurenceau, J.-P., Stanley, S. M., Olmos-Gallo, A., Baucom, B., & Markman, H. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- University of Denver (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 933-943
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2049319606
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH64779, R01MH035525, R01MH35525, K01MH064779)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- newlyweds, religious organizations, relationship satisfaction, community-based intervention, dissemination, marriage preparation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Marriage, Preventive Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cluster Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
