Prospective follow-up of girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into adolescence: Evidence for continuing cross-domain impairment.
Abstract
The authors performed 5-year prospective follow-up (retention rate = 92%) with an ethnically diverse sample of girls, aged 11-18 years, who had been diagnosed in childhood with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; N = 140) and a matched comparison group (N = 88). Hyperactive-impulsive symptoms were more likely to abate than inattentive symptoms. Across multiple domains of symptoms and functional impairment, girls with ADHD continued to display deficits of moderate to large effect size in relation to the comparison girls, but few differences emerged between the inattentive versus combined types. Follow-up effects withstood statistical control of crucial covariates for most outcomes, meaning that there were specific effects of childhood ADHD on follow-up status; in other instances, baseline disruptive disorders accounted for adolescent effects. For outcomes identical at baseline and follow-up, girls with ADHD showed more improvement across time than comparison girls (except for math achievement). Overall, ADHD in girls portends continuing impairment 5 years after childhood ascertainment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyperactivity is more observable in children than in adults.
“This reflects the findings on the development of ADHD symptoms from childhood to adulthood, demonstrating that hyperactivity is more observable in children than in adults [14, 83, 84].”
From Assessing ADHD symptoms in children and adults: evaluating the role of objective measures (2018) · cites this paper as [83]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 264
- Authors
- Hinshaw, S. P., Owens, E. B., Sami, N., & Fargeon, S.
- Affiliations
- Palo Alto University (US)
- Institute for Human Development (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Hinshaw, Stephen P.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 489-499
- ISSN
- 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2117
- OpenAlex
- W2154018828
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (45064)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, girls, adolescence, inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, functional disability, disruptive behavior disorders, mathematics achievement, ADHD subtypes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Observer Variation, Prevalence, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review