Cited by 264Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Prospective follow-up of girls with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder into adolescence: Evidence for continuing cross-domain impairment.

Hinshaw, Stephen P., Owens, Elizabeth B., Sami, Nilofar, Fargeon, Samantha·2006·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

The authors performed 5-year prospective follow-up (retention rate = 92%) with an ethnically diverse sample of girls, aged 11-18 years, who had been diagnosed in childhood with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; N = 140) and a matched comparison group (N = 88). Hyperactive-impulsive symptoms were more likely to abate than inattentive symptoms. Across multiple domains of symptoms and functional impairment, girls with ADHD continued to display deficits of moderate to large effect size in relation to the comparison girls, but few differences emerged between the inattentive versus combined types. Follow-up effects withstood statistical control of crucial covariates for most outcomes, meaning that there were specific effects of childhood ADHD on follow-up status; in other instances, baseline disruptive disorders accounted for adolescent effects. For outcomes identical at baseline and follow-up, girls with ADHD showed more improvement across time than comparison girls (except for math achievement). Overall, ADHD in girls portends continuing impairment 5 years after childhood ascertainment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.74.3.489

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 264

Authors
Hinshaw, S. P., Owens, E. B., Sami, N., & Fargeon, S.
Affiliations
  • Palo Alto University (US)
  • Institute for Human Development (IN)
Corresponding author
Hinshaw, Stephen P.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2006-06
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
489-499
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2154018828
Cited by
264
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (45064)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, girls, adolescence, inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, functional disability, disruptive behavior disorders, mathematics achievement, ADHD subtypes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Social Behavior, Observer Variation, Prevalence, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review