Cited by 533Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsHealth Policy Implementation Science

Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: Analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors.

Perepletchikova, Francheska, Treat, Teresa A., Kazdin, Alan E.·2007·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Treatment integrity refers to the degree to which an intervention is delivered as intended. Two studies evaluated the adequacy of treatment integrity procedures (including establishing, assessing, evaluating, and reporting integrity; therapist treatment adherence; and therapist competence) implemented in psychotherapy research, as well as predictors of their implementation. Randomized controlled trials of psychosocial interventions published in 6 influential psychological and psychiatric journals were reviewed and coded for treatment integrity implementation. Results indicate that investigations that systematically addressed treatment integrity procedures are virtually absent in the literature. Treatment integrity was adequately addressed for only 3.50% of the evaluated psychosocial interventions. Journal of publication and treatment approach predicted integrity implementation. Skill-building treatments (e.g., cognitive-behavioral) as compared with non-skill-building interventions (e.g., psychodynamic, nondirective counseling) were implemented with higher attention to integrity procedures. Guidelines for implementation of treatment integrity procedures need to be reevaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.75.6.829

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 533

Authors
Perepletchikova, F., Treat, T. A., & Kazdin, A. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2007
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
829-841
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W1993183309
Cited by
533
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 32
FWCI
16.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert M. Leylan Dissertation Fellowship
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
implementation fidelity, psychotherapy research, therapist adherence, therapist competence, psychosocial interventions, randomized controlled trials, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, non-directive counseling, research reporting practices
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review