The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring white racial identity: A reply to Helms (1997).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some of these models were developed in response to Helms, based in particular on psychometric critique of the scales used to measure WRID quantitatively (Behrens & Rowe, 1997; Rowe, 2006).”
From Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context (2022) · cites this paper as Behrens & Rowe, 1997
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context
Moffitt, U., & Rogers, L. O. (2022) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12762 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Behrens, J. T., & Rowe, W.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- ORCID
- Behrens, John T.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-19
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2044630613
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- white identity, white privilege, racial identity development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
