The Strong Ring: A Basic Interest Model of Occupational Structure.
Abstract
A classification system and spatial map of occupations were developed using the Basic Interest Scale profiles of 198 occupational incumbent samples (31,010 women; 32,421 men) from the Strong Interest Inventory. Profile shape was found to be similar for incumbents of both genders, allowing for an analysis of combined-gender samples. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, the authors identified 9 general interest areas subdivided into 19 occupational clusters. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling was used to create a spatial representation, producing a 3-dimensional ringlike structure called the Strong Ring. Dimension labels were identified using property vector fitting of O*NET variables. These dimensions were (a) Persuasion Versus Problem Solving, (b) Structured Versus Dynamic, and (c) Social Service Versus Solitary Work. This new model provides an organizational and interpretive framework for professional, technical, managerial, and skilled occupations. Of all widely used psychological tests, the Strong Interest Inventory, first published in 1927, has the longest history (Campbell, 1971). Research on the Strong Interest Inventory (herein called the Strong) has had a major impact on interest assessment and career counseling (Borgen, 1986). Of the many contributions, the introduction of the Occupational Scales (E. K. Strong, 1927), the development of Basic Interest Scales (BISs; Campbell, Borgen, Eastes, Johansson, & Peterson, 1968), and the use of Holland’s (1959, 1997) theory to…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Assessing more specific interest dimensions can better inform the assessment of person-environment fit and provide more flexibility for describing specific jobs and fields of study.
“Most notably, assessing more specific interest dimensions can better inform the assessment of person-environment (P-E) fit and provide more flexibility for describing specific jobs and fields of study (e.g., Armstrong et al., 2004;Ralston et al., 2004;Rounds, 1995).”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2004
The RIASEC model only captures a subset of important basic interest dimensions that are demanded in the labor market.
“Although the RIASEC model still dominates the application of vocational interests, it only captures a subset of important basic interest dimensions that are demanded in the labor market (Armstrong et al., 2004;Su et al., 2019).”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET)
Chu, C., Hoff, K. A., Liu, Z., Heimpel, N. F., Greco, A., Oswald, F. L., & Rounds, J. (2026) · Journal of Career Assessment · doi:10.1177/10690727251322520 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Although the RIASEC model still dominates the application of vocational interests, it only captures a subset of important basic interest dimensions that are demanded in the labor market (Armstrong et al., 2004; Su et al., 2019).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Armstrong, P. I., Smith, T. J., Donnay, D. A. C., & Rounds, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 299-313
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2099619487
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Strong Interest Inventory, occupational classification, occupational structure, career interest, interest profiles, occupational clusters, O*NET, career guidance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
