Cited by 268Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity.

Lopez, Frederick G., Rice, Kenneth G.·2006·Journal of Counseling Psychology

Abstract

The authors describe the preliminary development and validation of the Authenticity in Relationships Scale. An initial pool of 37 items addressing various elements of the proposed definition of “relationship authenticity ” was administered to 2 independent samples of undergraduates (N 487) who acknowl-edged being in a current romantic relationship. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that 2 interpretable factors (Unacceptability of Deception, Intimate Risk Taking) effectively represented the data in both samples. Retest data over a 3-month interval were also gathered from a separate independent sample of 121 participants. Subscale scores composed of factor-unique items demonstrated good reliability and test–retest stability, correlated in expected directions with scores on several measures used to establish construct validity, and made unique contributions to the prediction of relationship satisfaction after gender, self-esteem, commitment level, and adult attachment orientations were con-trolled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.362

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 52 · Cited by 268

Authors
Lopez, F. G., & Rice, K. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Counseling Psychology
Published
2006-07
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
362-371
ISSN
  • 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2168
OpenAlex
W2132909229
Cited by
268
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, scale development, construct validity, test-retest reliability, adult attachment, self-esteem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review