Preliminary development and validation of a measure of relationship authenticity.
Abstract
The authors describe the preliminary development and validation of the Authenticity in Relationships Scale. An initial pool of 37 items addressing various elements of the proposed definition of “relationship authenticity ” was administered to 2 independent samples of undergraduates (N 487) who acknowl-edged being in a current romantic relationship. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that 2 interpretable factors (Unacceptability of Deception, Intimate Risk Taking) effectively represented the data in both samples. Retest data over a 3-month interval were also gathered from a separate independent sample of 121 participants. Subscale scores composed of factor-unique items demonstrated good reliability and test–retest stability, correlated in expected directions with scores on several measures used to establish construct validity, and made unique contributions to the prediction of relationship satisfaction after gender, self-esteem, commitment level, and adult attachment orientations were con-trolled.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 268
- Authors
- Lopez, F. G., & Rice, K. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- ORCID
- Rice, Kenneth G.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 362-371
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2132909229
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
- Keywords
- romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, scale development, construct validity, test-retest reliability, adult attachment, self-esteem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review