Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use.
Open accessAbstract
El presente documento corresponde a una tesis doctoral en educación que investiga el efecto de una estrategia pedagógica basada en promover el automonitoreo por medio de un andamiaje metacognitivo computacional, sobre las habilidades metacognitivas y el logro de aprendizaje en estudiantes de medicina con diferentes tipos de estilo cognitivo y estilo de aprendizaje.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students who are more effective self-regulated learners are more successful in general and in STEM.
“Students who are more effective self-regulated learners are more successful in general (Plant, Ericsson, Hill, & Asberg, 2005; B. Zimmerman & Martinez-Pons, 1990), and in STEM”
From Exploring Organic Chemistry I students’ responses to an exam wrapper intervention. (2020) · cites this paper as B. Zimmerman & Martinez-Pons, 1990
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 1,825
- Authors
- Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M.
- Affiliations
- City University of New York (US)
- ORCID
- Zimmerman, Barry J.
- Venue
- Journal of Educational Psychology
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-59
- ISSN
- 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2176
- OpenAlex
- W2087739832
- Cited by
- 1,825
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 90 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 100 · 2012: 87
- FWCI
- 22.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, self-efficacy, metacognitive strategy use, metacognitive scaffolding, cognitive style, learning styles, medical students, academic performance, sex differences, giftedness, grade level differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
