A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information-processing model.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to further investigate the suggestion made by Naveh-Benjamin, McKeachie, and Lin (1987) regarding the distinction between two types of high test-anxious students who can be differentiated by their information-processing skills. The first type consists of students with good study habits who have difficulties mostly in retrieval for a test. The second type consists of students with poor study habits who have problems in all stages of processing. Each of the 84 high test-anxious university students was subjected to either desensitization or study skills training
Cites (1)
- Test anxiety and direction of attentionWine, Jeri · 1971 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (6)
- Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review.Covington, Martin V. · 2000 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Cognitive test anxiety and academic performanceCassady, Jerrell C., Johnson, Ronald E. · 2002 · Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Evolutionary Personality PsychologyBuss, David M. · 1991 · Annual Review of Psychology
- Anxiety and Speaking English as a Second LanguageWoodrow, Lindy · 2006 · RELC Journal
- Self-regulated learning training programs enhance university students’ academic performance, self-regulated learning strategies, and motivation: A meta-analysisTheobald, Maria · 2021 · Contemporary Educational Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information-processing model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-0663.83.1.134
- The paper
- Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1991). A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information-processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.83.1.134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.