Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma.
Abstract
The impact of three programmed strategies (tit-for-tat, 100% cooperation, and 100% defection) on cooperation level in the Prisoner's Dilemma game is examined as a function of the subject's motivational orientation (cooperative, competitive, or individualistic). Motivational orientation was assessed on the basis of each subject's choices across four classes of decomposed games. Following this assessment, subject's played 30 trials of Prisoner's dilemma in matrix form against one of the above-mentioned strategies. Results were wholly consistent with predictions, showing that (a) cooperatively oriented subjects cooperate with a tit-for-tat and a 100% cooperative strategy, but defect against a 100% defecting strategy, (b) competitive subjects defect against all three strategies; and (c) individualistic subjects defect against both 100% cooperative and 100% defective strategies, but they cooperate with a tit-for-tat strategy. It appears reasonable to conclude that the outcomes of a Prisoner's Dilemma have affectively different meaning (i.e., values) for subjects of differing orientations, and that subjects of all three orientations adopt strategies that effectively maximize their particular type of reward in the game.
Cited by (13)
- The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations.Fiske, Alan P. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperationKollock, Peter · 1998 · Annual Review of Sociology
- Effects of Ethnic Group Cultural Differences on Cooperative and Competitive Behavior On a Group TaskCox, T. H., Lobel, S. A., McLeod, P. L. · 1991 · Academy of Management Journal
- The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation.Van Lange, Paul A. M. · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Measuring Social Value OrientationMurphy, Ryan O., Ackermann, Kurt A., Handgraaf, Michel J. J. · 2011 · Judgment and Decision Making
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.32.5.922
- The paper
- Kuhlman, D. M., & Marshello, A. F. (1975). Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.32.5.922
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.