Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation.
Abstract
Abstract : Two experiments investigated effects of communication on behavior in an 8-person commons dilemma of group versus individual gain. Subjects made a single choice involving a substantial amount of money (possible outcomes ranging from nothing to $10.50). In Experiment 1, 4 communication conditions were crossed with the possibility of losing money (loss, no loss). Subjects chose defecting or cooperating responses and predicted responses of other group members. Results showed defection significantly higher in no communication and irrelevant communication conditions than in relevant communication and relevant communication plus roll call conditions. Loss had no effect on decisions. Defectors expected much more defection than did cooperators. Experiment 2 replicated irrelevant communication and communication effects, and compared predictions of participants with those of observers.
Cited by (33)
- Gender Differences in PreferencesCroson, Rachel, Gneezy, Uri · 2009 · Journal of Economic Literature
- Collective action and the evolution of social norms.Ostrom, Elinor · 2000 · Journal of Economic Perspectives
- In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Brewer, Marilynn B. · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
- Trust and commitment in the United States and JapanYamagishi, Toshio, Yamagishi, Midori · 1994 · Motivation and Emotion
- The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social NormsBicchieri, Cristina · 2005
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.35.1.1
- The paper
- Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.35.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.