Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing
Abstract
Two experiments found that when asked to perform the physically exerting tasks of clapping and shouting, people exhibit a sizable decrease in individual effort when performing in groups as compared to when they perform alone. This decrease, which we call social loafing, is in addition to losses due to faulty coordination of group efforts. Social loafing is discussed in terms of its experimental generality and theoretical importance. The widespread occurrence, the negative consequences for society, and some conditions that can minimize social loafing are also explored. There is an old saying that hands make light the work. This saying is interesting for two reasons. First, it captures one of the promises of social life—that with social organization people can fulfill their individual goals more easily through collective action. When many hands are available, people often do not have to work as hard as when only a few are present. The saying is interesting in a second, less hopeful way—it seems that when many hands are available, people actually work less hard than they ought to.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In shouting tasks, half the performance decrement was due to incoordination (coordination loss) and the other half to motivation loss (social loafing).
“Latane et al. (1979), in shouting tasks, found that half the performance decrement was due to incoordination, say coordination loss, and the other half to motivation loss, that is, social loafing.”
From The Moderating Influence of In-Group Collectivism on Social Loafing: An Experimental Study on a Manufacturing Factory (2026) · cites this paper as Latane et al. (1979)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 2,216
- Authors
- Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- ORCID
- Williams, Kipling
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1979-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 822-832
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2073598993
- Cited by
- 2,216
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 91 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 85 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 81
- FWCI
- 9.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- social loafing, collective effort, individual effort, group coordination, collective action, physical exertion, clapping, shouting, social facilitation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review