Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling.

Thomas D. Gilovich·1983·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Perhaps the most striking aspect of gambling behavior is that people continue to gamble despite persistent failure. One reason for this persistence may be that gamblers evaluate outcomes in a biased manner. Specifically, gamblers may tend to accept wins at face value but explain away or discount losses. Experiment 1 tested this hypothesis by recording subjects' explanations of the outcomes of their bets on professional football games. The results supported the hypothesis: Subjects spent more time explaining their losses than their wins. A content analysis of these explanations revealed that subjects tended to discount their losses but "bolster" their wins Finally, subjects remembered their losses better during a recall test 3 weeks later. Experiments 2 and 3 extended this analysis by demonstrating that a manipulation of the salience or existence of a critical "fluke" play in a sporting event had a greater impact on the subsequent expectations of those who had bet on the losing team than of those who had bet on the winning team. Both the implications and the possible mechanisms underlying these biases are discussed.

Cites (3)

  1. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence
    Lord, Charles G., Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R. · 1979 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1980 · American Psychologist
  3. Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system
    Mahoney, Michael J. · 1977 · Cognitive Therapy and Research

Show all 3 references

Cited by (33)

  1. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
    Markus, Hazel R., Kitayama, Shinobu · 1991 · Psychological Review
  2. The case for motivated reasoning.
    Kunda, Ziva · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Bad Is Stronger Than Good
    Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, Finkenauer, Catrin, Vohs, Kathleen D. · 2001 · Review of General Psychology
  4. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises
    Nickerson, Raymond S. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
  5. False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
    Simmons, Joseph P., Nelson, Leif D., Simonsohn, Uri · 2011 · Psychological Science

See all 408

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.44.6.1110
The paper
Gilovich, T. D. (1983). Biased evaluation and persistence in gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.44.6.1110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.