Cited by 115Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

Repression and the inaccessibility of affective memories.

Davis, Penelope J., Schwartz, Gary E.·1987·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.155

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of recent studies have provided evidence suggesting that motivated forgetting of emotionally significant events does occur.

    “Although repression has been a difficult phenomenon to demonstrate unequivocally (D. J. Holmes, 1974), a number of recent studies have provided evidence that suggests that motivated forgetting of emotionally significant events does, in fact, occur (e.g., Davis, 1987; Davis & Schwartz, 1987; Hansen & Hansen, 1988).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, P. J., & Schwartz, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1987
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
155-162
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4245363474
Cited by
115
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
repression, emotional memory, memory accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review