The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms
Abstract
In this experiment, we tested for opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of pain control through cognitive means and the relation of opioid involvement to perceived coping efficacy. Subjects were taught cognitive methods of pain control, were administered a placebo, or received no intervention. Their pain tolerance was then measured at periodic intervals after they were administered either a saline solution or naloxone, an opiate antagonist that blocks the effects of endogenous opiates. Training in cognitive control strengthened perceived self-efficacy both to withstand and to reduce pain; placebo medication enhanced perceived efficacy to withstand pain but not reductive efficacy; and neither form of perceived self-efficacy changed without any intervention. Regardless of condition, the stronger the perceived self-efficacy to withstand pain, the longer subjects endured mounting pain stimulation. The findings provide evidence that attenuation of the impact of pain stimulation through cognitive control is mediated by both opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. Cognitive copers administered naloxone were less able to tolerate pain stimulation than were their saline counterparts. The stronger the perceived self-efficacy to reduce pain, the greater was the opioid activation. Cognitive copers were also able to achieve some increase in pain tolerance even when opioid mechanisms were blocked by naloxone, which is in keeping with a nonopioid component in cognitive pain control. We found suggestive evidence that placebo medication may also activate some opioid involvement. Because placebos do not impart pain reduction skills, it was perceived self-efficacy to endure pain that predicted degree of opioid activation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“One exception is the area of chronic pain research, where several studies demonstrated that perceived self-efficacy not only modulates pain perception (Bandura et al., 1987), but crucially determines coping behavior and quality of life, independently of and often more strongly than physical variables, such as pain intensity or duration (Arnstein et al., 1999; Denison et al., 2004; Burke et al., 20”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Bandura et al., 1987
In the citing paper
“Opioidergic mechanisms have been repeatedly demonstrated to be involved in cognitive inhibition of pain (Bandura et al., 1987;Tracey et al., 2002;Wager et al., 2007).”
From Mindfulness-meditation-based pain relief is not mediated by endogenous opioids (2016) · cites this paper as Bandura et al., 1987
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–315 of 315
الدسوقي, و. ص. ا. إ., & الوكیل, م. أ. ا. ع. (2023) · تکنولوجيا التعليم سلسلة دراسات وبحوث · doi:10.21608/tesr.2023.285984
Building Consumer Loyalty Through Iconic Destination Image of Lake Toba, North Sumatra, Indonesia
(2023) · Quality - Access to Success · doi:10.47750/qas/24.195.37
Khampanthip, A., Janwantanakul, P., Kanlayanaphotporn, R., & Jensen, M. P. (2019) · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2019.429
CRENÇAS ACERCA DA VIOLÊNCIA INTERPARENTAL
Vieira, I. A., Sequeira, J., & Sani, A. I. (2024) · Recital - Revista de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Almenara/MG · doi:10.46636/recital.v5i3.467
الارهاق المعرفي لدى طلبة الجامعة
سعود, ج. س., & أحمد, ش. م. (2023) · Journal of Tikrit University for Humanities · doi:10.25130/jtuh.30.10.1.2023.15
Peter, M. K., Zobair, K. M., Lindeque, J. P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyaf027
Wood, R., Kent, D., Liao, Y., Bu, D., musleh, L., & Borgnolo, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5544375
Fujii, R., Matsuda, Y., Okada, M., Ishikura, H., Imai, Y., Muraoka, R., & Hasuo, H. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103580 · Cited by 1
Mabunda, N. F., Motaung, D., & Rambuwani, Y. (2026) · MethodsX · doi:10.1016/j.mex.2026.103954 · Cited by 1
Sunzeri, F. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14465-2_14
A Global Evaluation of Multimodal Nursing Led Pain Management Programs in the Peri-Operative Period
Li, S., Yuan, J., Yang, Z., & Bao, Y. (2026) · Pain Management Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2026.08.015
Chaplin, W. J., Abbott-Fleming, V., McWilliams, D. F., et al. (2026) · Journal of International Medical Research · doi:10.1177/03000605261494344
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandura, A., O'Leary, A., Taylor, C. B., Gauthier, J., & Gossard, D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 563-571
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2166653039
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-5162-25)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- self-efficacy, pain management, cognitive coping, pain tolerance, opioid mechanisms, naloxone, placebo effect, analgesia
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Male, Nociceptors, Pain, Pain Measurement, Receptors, Opioid, Self Concept, Sensory Thresholds, Set, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review