Cited by 198Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPsychology of Social Influence

Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments.

Sorrentino, Richard M., Bobocel, D. Ramona, Gitta, Maria Z., Olson, James M., Hewitt, Erin C.·1988·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.357

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 198

Authors
Sorrentino, R. M., Bobocel, D. R., Gitta, M. Z., Olson, J. M., & Hewitt, E. C.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1988-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
357-371
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2077291249
Cited by
198
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
uncertainty orientation, persuasion, personal relevance, social judgment, individual differences, attitude change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review