Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information.
Abstract
Study 1 established either deliberative mind-set by having Ss contemplate personal change decision or implemental mind-set by having Ss plan execution of intended personal project. Ss were subse-quently requested to continue beginnings of 3 fairy tales, each describing a main character with a decisional conflict. Analysis revealed that deliberative mind-set Ss ascribed more deliberative and less implementational efforts to main characters than implemental mind-set Ss. In Study 2, Ss were asked to choose between different test materials. Either before or after making their decision, Ss were given information on deliberative and implementational thoughts unrelated to their task at hand. When asked to recall these thoughts, predecisional Ss recalled more deliberative and less implementational thoughts, whereas for postdecisional Ss the reverse was true. These findings suggest that deliberative and implemental mind-sets tune thought production and information processing. A course of action may be conceived rather narrowly as ex-tending from its initiation (starting point) to its termination (end point). Alternatively, one may adopt a broader perspective that embraces the motivational origins of an action as the actual
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technical training alone may be insufficient without some type of enhancement that allows people to apply the skills and knowledge obtained from training programs.
“Collectively, these studies emphasize that technical training alone may be insufficient without some type of enhancement to the training that allows people to apply the skills and knowledge obtained from training programs (Campos et al., 2017;Gollwitzer et al., 1990).”
From The impact of growth mindset training on entrepreneurial action among necessity entrepreneurs: Evidence from a randomized control trial (2023) · cites this paper as Gollwitzer et al., 1990
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 32 · Cited by 627
- Authors
- Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- ORCID
- Gollwitzer, Peter M.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1119-1127
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2066759017
- Cited by
- 627
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- decision-making, decisional conflict, information processing, project planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review