The personality structure of affect.
Abstract
We examined the organization of individual differences in pleasant affect, unpleasant affect, and six discrete emotions. We used several refinements over past studies: a) systematic sampling of emotions; b) control of measurement error through the use of latent traits; c) multiple methods for measuring affect; d) inclusion of only affects that are widely agreed to be emotions; e) a statistical definition of independence; and f) a focus on the frequency and duration of long-term affect. There was strong convergence between the two pleasant emotions (love and joy) and between the four unpleasant emotions (fear, anger, sadness, and shame). The results indicated, however, that individual differences in the discrete emotions cannot be reduced to positive and negative affect. The latent traits of pleasant and unpleasant affect were correlated -.44, and a two-factor model accounted for significantly more variance than a one-factor model. This finding indicates that long-term pleasant and unpleasant affect are not strictly orthogonal, but they are separable.
Cites (8)
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin
- The Cognitive Structure of EmotionsOrtony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald L., Collins, Allan · 1988
- Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional statesWatson, David, Clark, Lee A. · 1984 · Psychological Bulletin
- Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling MethodCSIKSZENTMIHALYI, MIHALY, LARSON, REED · 1987 · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Voluntary Facial Action Generates Emotion‐Specific Autonomic Nervous System ActivityLevenson, Robert W., Ekman, Paul, Friesen, Wallace V. · 1990 · Psychophysiology
- Basic emotions, relations among emotions, and emotion-cognition relations.Izard, Carroll E. · 1992 · Psychological Review
- Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality.Marshall, Grant N., Wortman, Camille B., Kusulas, Jeffrey W., Hervig, Linda K., Vickers, Ross R. · 1992 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Optimism, pessimism and mental health: A twin/adoption analysisPlomin, Robert, Scheier, Michael F., Bergeman, C.S., Pedersen, N.L., Nesselroade, J.R., McClearn, G.E. · 1992 · Personality and Individual Differences
Cited by (36)
- Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.Diener, Ed, Suh, Eunkook M., Lucas, Richard E., Smith, Heidi L. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
- The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative reviewGross, James J. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
- The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
- The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in lifeSteger, Michael F., Frazier, Patricia, Oishi, Shigehiro, Kaler, Matthew · 2006 · Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Very Happy PeopleDiener, Ed, Seligman, Martin E.P. · 2002 · Psychological Science
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The personality structure of affect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.130
- The paper
- Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.