Discriminant validity of well-being measures.

Richard E. Lucas, Ed Diener, Eunkook Mark Suh·1996·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The convergent and discriminant validities of well-being concepts were examined using multitrait-multimethod matrix analyses (D. T. Campbell & D. W. Fiske, 1959) on 3 sets of data. In Study 1, participants completed measures of life satisfaction, positive affect, negative affect, self-esteem, and optimism on 2 occasions 4 weeks apart and also obtained 3 informant ratings. In Study 2, participants completed each of the 5 measures on 2 occasions 2 years apart and collected informant reports at Time 2. In Study 3, participants completed 2 different scales for each of the 5 constructs. Analyses showed that (a) life satisfaction is discriminable from positive and negative affect, (b) positive affect is discriminable from negative affect, (c) life satisfaction is discriminable from optimism and self-esteem, and (d) optimism is separable from trait measures of negative affect.

Cites (5)

  1. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
    Ortony, Andrew, Clore, Gerald L., Collins, Allan · 1988
  2. The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
    Beck, Aaron T., Weissman, Arlene, Lester, David, Trexler, Larry · 1974 · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  3. Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
    Diener, Ed · 1994 · Social Indicators Research
  4. How coping mediates the effect of optimism on distress: a study of women with early stage breast cancer
    Carver, Charles S., Pozo, Christina, Harris, Suzanne D., Noriega, Victoria, Scheier, Michael F., Robinson, David S., Ketcham, Alfred S., Moffat, Frederick L., Clark, Kimberley C. · 1993 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality.
    Marshall, Grant N., Wortman, Camille B., Kusulas, Jeffrey W., Hervig, Linda K., Vickers, Ross R. · 1992 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 5 references

Cited by (84)

  1. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
    Diener, Ed, Suh, Eunkook M., Lucas, Richard E., Smith, Heidi L. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?
    Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura, Diener, Ed · 2005 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index
    Diener, Ed · 2000 · American Psychologist
  4. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life
    Steger, Michael F., Frazier, Patricia, Oishi, Shigehiro, Kaler, Matthew · 2006 · Journal of Counseling Psychology
  5. Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being
    Kahneman, Daniel, Krueger, Alan B · 2006 · Journal of Economic Perspectives

See all 1,747

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discriminant validity of well-being measures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.616
The paper
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.616

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.