Cited by 470Identity, Memory, and TherapyAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Stories of commitment: The psychosocial construction of generative lives.

McAdams, Dan P., Diamond, Ann, de St. Aubin, Ed, Mansfield, Elizabeth·1997·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

In this study, the authors analyzed the internalized life stories of 40 highly generative and 30 less generative adults with similar demographic profiles to discern the extent to which the 2 groups constructed different identities. The highly generative adults were more likely to reconstruct the past and anticipate the future as variations on a prototypical commitment story in which the protagonist (a) enjoys an early family blessing or advantage, (b) is sensitized to others' suffering at an early age, (c) is guided by a clear and compelling personal ideology that remains stable over time, (d) transforms or redeems bad scenes into good outcomes, and (e) sets goals for the future to benefit society. Commitment stories sustain and reinforce the modern adult's efforts to contribute in positive ways to the next generation. The findings connect to a growing interdisciplinary literature on narrative and human lives and suggest a new research agenda that draws on nomothetic conventions to interpret storied psychosocial constructions that people fashion to make sense of their lives in time and in culture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.678

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Midlife American adults who score especially high on self-report measures of generativity tend to see their own lives as narratives of redemption.

    “In a series of nomothetic and idiographic studies conducted over the past 15 years, McAdams and colleagues have consistently found that midlife American adults who score especially high on self-report measures of generativity-suggesting a strong commitment to promoting the well-being of future generations and improving the world in which they live (Erikson, 1963)-tend to see their own”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 470

Authors
McAdams, D. P., Diamond, A., de St. Aubin, E., & Mansfield, E.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1997
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
678-694
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2086300934
Cited by
470
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 20
FWCI
17.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
generativity, life stories, identity construction, narrative, meaning of life, social contribution, personal ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review