Cited by 215Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and Assessment

Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates.

McCrae, Robert R., Yik, Michelle S. M., Trapnell, Paul D., Bond, Michael H., Paulhus, Delroy L.·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Prior research (R.R. McCrae, P.T. Costa, & M.S. Yik, 1996) using a Chinese translation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory suggested substantial differences between Hong Kong and North American undergraduates. Study 1, with a sample of bilingual Hong Kong students (N = 162), showed that prior findings were not due simply to the translation. Study 2, with undergraduates of European and Chinese ancestry living in Canada (N = 633), suggested that more of the differences were cultural in origin. Study 3, which used peer ratings of Chinese students (N = 99), replicated most Study 2 results, suggesting that exposure to Canadian culture increased openness, cheerfulness, and prosocial behavior and attitudes. Differences in sense of competence and vulnerability to stress appeared to be due to different cultural standards for judging these traits. Together, the 3 studies illustrate an integrated approach to interpreting personality differences across cultures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.1041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 46 · Cited by 215

Authors
McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S. M., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H., & Paulhus, D. L.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1998
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
1041-1055
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1994238934
Cited by
215
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
NEO-PI-R, Chinese undergraduates, Hong Kong students, bilingualism, acculturation, peer ratings, openness to experience, prosocial behavior, stress vulnerability, sense of competence
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Canada, China, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Social Perception, Translating, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review