Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer rating studies of Chinese undergraduates.
Abstract
Prior research (R.R. McCrae, P.T. Costa, & M.S. Yik, 1996) using a Chinese translation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory suggested substantial differences between Hong Kong and North American undergraduates. Study 1, with a sample of bilingual Hong Kong students (N = 162), showed that prior findings were not due simply to the translation. Study 2, with undergraduates of European and Chinese ancestry living in Canada (N = 633), suggested that more of the differences were cultural in origin. Study 3, which used peer ratings of Chinese students (N = 99), replicated most Study 2 results, suggesting that exposure to Canadian culture increased openness, cheerfulness, and prosocial behavior and attitudes. Differences in sense of competence and vulnerability to stress appeared to be due to different cultural standards for judging these traits. Together, the 3 studies illustrate an integrated approach to interpreting personality differences across cultures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chinese immigrants scored relatively higher on agreeableness than Canadians.
“In McCrae, Yik, Trapnell, Bond, and Paulhus' (1998) study, Chinese immigrants scored relatively higher on agreeableness than Canadians, suggesting that the Chinese in their study had the tendency to be more cooperative and concerned for others rather than themselves.”
From Maladaptive Perfectionism, Disguised Distress, and Help Seeking in the Culture of 'Saving Face': Links to Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms among Asian Youth (2019) · cites this paper as McCrae, Yik, Trapnell, Bond, and Paulhus' (1998)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 215
- Authors
- McCrae, R. R., Yik, M. S. M., Trapnell, P. D., Bond, M. H., & Paulhus, D. L.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1041-1055
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W1994238934
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- NEO-PI-R, Chinese undergraduates, Hong Kong students, bilingualism, acculturation, peer ratings, openness to experience, prosocial behavior, stress vulnerability, sense of competence
- MeSH terms
- Acculturation, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Canada, China, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Social Perception, Translating, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review