Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins's (1987) hypotheses.
Abstract
A study of 229 undergraduates examined whether specific self-discrepancies are differentially related to shame proneness and guilt proneness. Contrary to E. T. Higgins (1987), but in line with the present authors' expectations, the tendency to experience shame, but not guilt, was positively related to all types of self-discrepancies. An attempt was also made to replicate E. T. Higgins, Klein, and Strauman's (1985) findings that specific self-discrepancies are associated with distinct emotion syndromes. No support was found for the central hypotheses of self-discrepancy theory. Finally, the authors evaluated the utility of two methods for assessing self-discrepancies. Higgins's qualitative method and quantitative adjective ratings. The two methods yielded essentially identical relationships to other variables. The very high correlations among different types of self-discrepancies within each method, however, raise discriminant validity concerns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adjective checklists have been found to be valid assessments of self-discrepancies in previous research.
“Adjective checklists have been found to be valid assessments of self-discrepancies in previous research [31,99].”
From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [99]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 296
- Authors
- Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 256-268
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W4322716237
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hd027171-08)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD27171-06, R01 HD27171-06S1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- shame, guilt, self-discrepancy theory, Higgins, self-concept, self-regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Shame, Students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review