Cited by 296Emotions and Moral BehaviorPersonality Traits and PsychologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Are shame and guilt related to distinct self-discrepancies? A test of Higgins's (1987) hypotheses.

Tangney, June Price, Niedenthal, Paula M., Covert, Michelle Vowell, Barlow, Deborah Hill·1998·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

A study of 229 undergraduates examined whether specific self-discrepancies are differentially related to shame proneness and guilt proneness. Contrary to E. T. Higgins (1987), but in line with the present authors' expectations, the tendency to experience shame, but not guilt, was positively related to all types of self-discrepancies. An attempt was also made to replicate E. T. Higgins, Klein, and Strauman's (1985) findings that specific self-discrepancies are associated with distinct emotion syndromes. No support was found for the central hypotheses of self-discrepancy theory. Finally, the authors evaluated the utility of two methods for assessing self-discrepancies. Higgins's qualitative method and quantitative adjective ratings. The two methods yielded essentially identical relationships to other variables. The very high correlations among different types of self-discrepancies within each method, however, raise discriminant validity concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.256

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adjective checklists have been found to be valid assessments of self-discrepancies in previous research.

    “Adjective checklists have been found to be valid assessments of self-discrepancies in previous research [31,99].”

    From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [99]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 296

Authors
Tangney, J. P., Niedenthal, P. M., Covert, M. V., & Barlow, D. H.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1998
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
256-268
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W4322716237
Cited by
296
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd027171-08)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD27171-06, R01 HD27171-06S1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
shame, guilt, self-discrepancy theory, Higgins, self-concept, self-regulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Guilt, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Shame, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review