The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Men's sexual self- schema
Abstract
Sexual self-schemas are cognitive generalizations about sexual aspects of oneself. In Part 1, a measure of men's sexual self-schema is developed. Studies of test-retest and internal consistency reliability and validity studies of factor analysis, internal structure, convergent and discriminant validity, process, group difference, and change are provided. The construct consists of 3 dimensions: passionate-loving, powerful-aggressive, and open-minded-liberal traits. In Part 2, the data suggest that men's sexual schema is derived from past sexual experience, is manifest in current sexual experience, and guides future sexual behavior. In Part 3, the data document the cognitive processing aspects of sexual schema. Consistent with the investigators' schema research with women, these data substantiate the importance of cognitive representations of sexuality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also evidence showing that men with ED report lower levels of self-confidence, more negative self-schema's, and a negative body-image.21,32, 33, 34, 35”
From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019 · Cited by 439
Santana, M. C., Raj, A., Decker, M. R., La Marche, A., & Silverman, J. G. (2006) · Journal of Urban Health · doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9061-6 · Cited by 368
Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma
Schover, L. R., Fouladi, R. T., Warneke, C. L., Neese, L., Klein, E. A., Zippe, C., & Kupelian, P. A. (2002) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.10848 · Cited by 305
Peplau, L. A. (2003) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01221 · Cited by 284
Yurek, D., Farrar, W. B., & Andersen, B. L. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.68.4.697 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 645-661
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2159235764
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 20.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- sexual self-schemas, men, sexual behavior, sexual experience, schema theory, sexual orientation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Personality, Self Concept, Sexual Behavior, Vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
