How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance.
Abstract
An important source of people's perceptions of their performance, and potential errors in those perceptions, are chronic views people hold regarding their abilities. In support of this observation, manipulating people's general views of their ability, or altering which view seemed most relevant to a task, changed performance estimates independently of any impact on actual performance. A final study extended this analysis to why women disproportionately avoid careers in science. Women performed equally to men on a science quiz, yet underestimated their performance because they thought less of their general scientific reasoning ability than did men. They, consequently, were more likely to refuse to enter a science competition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceptions people hold of their abilities or performance often are modestly correlated to their actual performance and at times tend to overestimate their abilities.
“It should be noted that the perceptions people hold of their abilities or performance often are modestly correlated to their actual performance and at times tend to overestimate their abilities (Ehrlinger & Dunning, 2003).”
From Relating preservice teacher's bilingual teaching self‐efficacy to lesson differentiation practices for multilingual learners (2025) · cites this paper as Ehrlinger & Dunning, 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 92 · Cited by 480
- Authors
- Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-17
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2065003940
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 92
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 17.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01-56072)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- ability beliefs, performance estimation, self-perception, gender differences, women in science, career choice, science competitions, self-efficacy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aptitude, Female, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Self Concept, Sex Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review