Cited by 480Education, Achievement, and GiftednessSocial and Intergroup PsychologyCareer Development and Diversity

How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance.

Ehrlinger, Joyce, Dunning, David·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

An important source of people's perceptions of their performance, and potential errors in those perceptions, are chronic views people hold regarding their abilities. In support of this observation, manipulating people's general views of their ability, or altering which view seemed most relevant to a task, changed performance estimates independently of any impact on actual performance. A final study extended this analysis to why women disproportionately avoid careers in science. Women performed equally to men on a science quiz, yet underestimated their performance because they thought less of their general scientific reasoning ability than did men. They, consequently, were more likely to refuse to enter a science competition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 92 · Cited by 480

Authors
Ehrlinger, J., & Dunning, D.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
5-17
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2065003940
Cited by
480
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 20
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (R01-56072)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
ability beliefs, performance estimation, self-perception, gender differences, women in science, career choice, science competitions, self-efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aptitude, Female, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Self Concept, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review