Cited by 300Cultural Differences and ValuesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking.

Kim, Heejung S., Drolet, Aimee·2003·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Three studies examined whether the tendency to seek variety in choices depends in part on cultural assumptions of choice and uniqueness. Study 1 showed that people from different cultures where different assumptions of choice and uniqueness dominate show different levels of variety in their choice rule use. Study 2 primed participants with magazine ads highlighting different representations of uniqueness dominant in individualist versus collectivist cultures to show the influence of cultural meanings of uniqueness on the variety-seeking tendency. Study 3 manipulated the motivation to display variety to demonstrate that variety-seeking in the United States partly hinges on cultural meanings of choice as self-expression. Variety-seeking in choice rule use was eliminated when participants had the chance to self-express through choice listing. The research illustrates the role of cultural assumptions in the variety-seeking tendency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.373

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The need for variety and uniqueness is weaker in East Asian cultures compared with Western cultures.

    “Similarly, the need for variety and uniqueness is weaker in East Asian cultures compared with Western cultures (Kim & Drolet, 2003; Kim & Markus, 1999).”

    From Creativity: The Influence of Cultural, Social, and Work Contexts (2010) · cites this paper as Kim & Drolet, 2003

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 54 · Cited by 300

Authors
Kim, H. S., & Drolet, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvey Mudd College (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
373-382
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2116417244
Cited by
300
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
variety seeking, choice rules, self-expression, uniqueness, individualism-collectivism, cultural assumptions, consumer choice, priming
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Culture, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Individuality, Korea, Male, Self Disclosure, Students, United States, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review