Meta-analysis of facial identification studies.
Abstract
Meta-analyse de 128 etudes consacrees a l'identification du temoignage oculaire et a la reconnaissance des visages, recherchant les facteurs influencant la performance et les secteurs de recherche a approfondir dans ce domaine
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neither the seminal Shapiro and Penrod (1986) meta-analysis of the eyewitness literature nor any subsequent one has addressed the effect of heightened stress on eyewitness memory.
“Now given that neither the seminal Shapiro and Penrod (1986) meta-analysis of the eyewitness literature nor any subsequent one has addressed the effect of heightened stress on eyewitness memory, it would be desirable to have a fi rm estimate of effect size and direction, both in regard to accuracy of face identifi cation and recall of details.”
From A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (2004) · cites this paper as Shapiro and Penrod, 1986
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 547
- Authors
- Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S.
- ORCID
- Penrod, Steven
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-156
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2049900498
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- face identification, eyewitness identification, face recognition (cognition), eyewitness testimony
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
