The illusion of reality – a review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations
Abstract
Hallucinations are among the most severe and puzzling forms of psychopathology. Although usually regarded as first-rank symptoms of schizophrenia, they are found in a wide range of medical and psychiatric conditions. Moreover, a substantial minority of otherwise normal individuals report hallucinatory experiences. The purpose of this article is to review the considerable research into the cognitive mechanisms underlying (particularly psychotic) hallucinations that has been carried out and to integrate this research within a general framework. The available evidence suggests that hallucinations result from a failure of the metacognitive skills involved in discriminating between self-generated and external sources of information. It is likely that different aspects of these skills are implicated in different types of hallucinatory experiences. Further research should focus on specific metacognitive deficits associated with different types of hallucinations and on treatment strategies designed to train hallucinators to reattribute thoughts to themselves.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A prominent theory holds that AVHs stem from misattribution of inner speech to an external source.
“A prominent theory of AVHs holds that they stem from misattribution of inner speech to an external source (Bentall, 1990; Feinberg, 1978; Frith, 1992).”
From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Bentall, 1990
A response bias such as externalizing bias would lead to a higher likelihood of stimuli of ambiguous source being attributed to an external source.
“A response bias such as this would lead to a higher likelihood of stimuli of ambiguous source being attributed to an external source (Bentall, 1990).”
From Auditory verbal hallucinations as atypical inner speech monitoring, and the potential of neurostimulation as a treatment option (2013) · cites this paper as Bentall, 1990
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 171 · Cited by 630
- Authors
- Bentall, R. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bentall, R. P.
- ORCID
- Bentall, R. P.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-95
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2040499400
- Semantic Scholar
- e5db7a2b83dd1e8a0862ef1c40e59b4413d6c3f5
- Cited by
- 630
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- hallucinations, metacognition, schizophrenia, first-rank symptoms, hallucination treatment
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Hallucinations, Humans, Models, Psychological, Physical Stimulation, Psychotic Disorders, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review