The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on psychotherapy efficacy and effectiveness: Between Scylla and Charybdis?
Abstract
Clinical researchers have recently begun to explore differences between psychotherapy outcome studies that focus on efficacy and those that focus on effectiveness. The authors provide concise descriptions of these research models, followed by more extended consideration of the most important conceptual and empirical distinctions between the two. Research on the efficacy/effectiveness distinction is then put into context: The common treatment variables that also influence treatment outcomes are reviewed. Fifty years of research on psychotherapy outcomes are next considered; contemporary research on the efficacy and effectiveness research models is emphasized. A description and evaluation of current efforts to heighten the value of technique-focused research to clinicians follow. The authors conclude by anticipating some promising future directions in this research domain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A limitation of this study was the lack of an active comparator, such as treatment-as-usual (Hanna, 2003; Nathan et al., 2000).”
From Effectiveness of web-based guided self-help cognitive behavioral therapy-enhanced for binge-eating disorder: An implementation study (2024) · cites this paper as Nathan et al., 2000
In the citing paper
“The randomized controlled design and the equivalence between the intervention groups are important factors enhancing the internal validity of a study [71].”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Second, although primarily an efficacy study, the generous inclusion of participants and the naturalistic setting of this study resemble the prioritizations of effectiveness studies [71], resulting in a reduced level of control regarding potential confounding variables (eg, heterogeneity within the sample in terms of the symptom severity, comorbidity, and concurrent treatments).”
From Comparing internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy with standard care for women with fear of birth: Randomized controlled trial (2018) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
(2012) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e675542012-001 · Cited by 9,678
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770
The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change.
Rogers, C. R. (1957) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045357 · Cited by 5,599
Rogers, C. R. (1961) · Cited by 4,342
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Garfield, S. L., Bergin, A. E., & Dryden, W. (1987) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.1.4.264a · Cited by 3,998
Cognitive Therapy in Depression
Kovács, M. (1980) · Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis · doi:10.1521/jaap.1.1980.8.1.127 · Cited by 3,422
Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139 · Cited by 2,673
The two disciplines of scientific psychology.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0043943 · Cited by 2,590
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change
Sanford, E. F. (1988) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1988.42.1.153 · Cited by 2,586
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 1952, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders.
- 1995, Template for developing guidelines: Interventions for mental disorders and psychosocial aspects of physical disorders.
- Beck, 1979, Cognitive therapy of depression.
- Beutler, 1994, Therapist variables., 229
- Carroll, 1962, Alice's adventures in Wonderland. Harmondsworth
- Chambless, 1998, Update on empirically validated therapies, II., The Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3
- Cohen, 1965, Some statistical issues in psychological research., 95
- Elkin, 1994, The NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Where we began and where we are., 114
- Eysenck, 1960, Behavior therapy and the neuroses.
- Glass, 1980, Summarizing effect sizes., 13
- Greenberg, 1994, Psychotherapy research: A clinician's view., 1
- Hays, 1963, Statistics.
- Howard, 1995, The design of clinically relevant outcome research: Some considerations and an example., 3
- Lambert, 1992, Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapies., 94
- Maling, 1994, From research to practice to research to, 246
- 1999, Bridging science and service.
- Orlinsky, 1986, Process and outcome in psychotherapy., 311
- Rachman, 1980, The effects of the psychological therapies.
- Smith, 1980, Integrating studies of psychotherapy outcomes., 47
- Smith, 1980, Benefits of psychotherapy.
- Spence, 1994, The failure to ask the hard questions., 19
- Strupp, 1984, Psychotherapy in a new key: A guide to time-limited psychotherapy.
- Weiss, 1986, The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observations, and empirical research.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Westen, D., Novotny, C. M., & Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631 · Cited by 1,212
The psychotherapy dose-response effect and its implications for treatment delivery services.
Hansen, N. B., Lambert, M. J., & Forman, E. M. (2002) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.9.3.329 · Cited by 783
Efficacy of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Postpartum Depression
O’Hara, M. W., Stuart, S. P., Gorman, L., & Wenzel, A. E. (2000) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1039 · Cited by 666
Self-citationWesten, D., & Morrison, K. (2001) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.69.6.875 · Cited by 635
Borckardt, J. J., Nash, M. R., Murphy, M. D., Moore, M., Shaw, D. L., & O'Neil, P. M. (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.2.77 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Nathan, P. E., Stuart, S. P., & Dolan, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 964-981
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1994615242
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 153
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 14.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- psychotherapy efficacy, psychotherapy effectiveness, treatment outcome research, treatment variables
- MeSH terms
- Forecasting, Health Services Research, Humans, Psychotherapy, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review