Behavioral bibliotherapy: a review of self-help behavior therapy manuals
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bibliotherapy is a legitimate and cost-effective method of behavioral intervention.
“These findings are consistent with earlier reviews which identified bibliotherapy as a legitimate and cost-effective method of behavioral intervention (67).”
From Recent developments in bibliotherapy for adolescent depression (2025) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 150 · Cited by 351
- Authors
- Glasgow, R. E., & Rosen, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W1983983601
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 150
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 28.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- bibliotherapy, self-help books, behavior therapy, psychotherapy manual
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Aggression, Anxiety, Behavior Therapy, Bibliotherapy, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Manuals as Topic, Obesity, Physical Fitness, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
