Cited by 126Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Psychological effects of imprisonment on confined individuals.

Bukstel, Lee H., Kilmann, Peter R.·1980·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Reviews 90 experimental studies that examined the psychological effects of imprisonment on performance, personality, and attitudinal variables. Analysis revealed that the studies had many methodological problems, including the use of inadequate research designs and unsystematic sampling procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.469

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bukstel, L. H., & Kilmann, P. R.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1980-09
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
469-493
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W1994994407
Cited by
126
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
incarceration, psychological effects of confinement, personality, attitudes, methodological issues, research design, sampling methods
MeSH terms
Attitude, Cognition, Humans, Perception, Personality, Prisoners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review