Cited by 684Sport Psychology and PerformancePsychology of Social InfluenceSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies.

Bond, Charles F., Titus, Linda J.·1983·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This article reports a meta-analysis of the effects of the presence of others on human task performance and physiology. In 241 studies involving nearly 24jOOO subjectSj the presence of others had small effects, accounting for .3% to 3% of the variance in the typical experiment. We conclude that (a) the presence of others heightens an individual's physiological arousal only if the individual is performing a complex task; (b) the presence of others increases the speed of simple task performance and decreases the speed of complex task performance; (c) the presence of others impairs complex performance accuracy and slightly facilitates simple performance accuracy, though the facilitation is vulnerable to the file drawer problem of unreported null results; and (d) social facilitation effects are surprisingly unrelated to the performer's evaluation apprehension. These metaanalytic conclusions are contrasted with conclusions reached by narrative literature reviews. Implications for theories of social facilitation are discussed. Since beginning their study of social influence, psychologists have been interested in a minimal source of influence: the mere presence of others. In the first investigation, Triplett (1898) found that adolescents could spin fishing reels more quickly when in coacting pairs than when alone. In other early research, Pessin (1933) discovered that college students made more errors in memorizing nonsense syllables if they learned the syllables in front of a spect…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.94.2.265

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mere presence of conspecifics around us affects our behavior.

    “one should also consider that the mere presence of conspecifics around us affects our behavior.”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Bond & Titus, 1983

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 239 · Cited by 684

Authors
Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J.
Affiliations
Connecticut College (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1983
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
265-292
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2113029148
Cited by
684
References
239
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 28
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social facilitation, presence of others, task performance, physiological arousal, task complexity, performance speed, performance accuracy, evaluation apprehension, file drawer problem, negative results, social influence
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Arousal, Drive, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Psychological Theory, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Social Facilitation, Sweating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review