The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: a dual-process approach
Abstract
This article explicates the interaction between implicit and explicit processes in skill learning, in contrast to the tendency of researchers to study each type in isolation. It highlights various effects of the interaction on learning (including synergy effects). The authors argue for an integrated model of skill learning that takes into account both implicit and explicit processes. Moreover, they argue for a bottom-up approach (first learning implicit knowledge and then explicit knowledge) in the integrated model. A variety of qualitative data can be accounted for by the approach. A computational model, CLARION, is then used to simulate a range of quantitative data. The results demonstrate the plausibility of the model, which provides a new perspective on skill learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research in cognitive skill training highlights contributions of explicit and implicit learning and identifies multiple training procedures that facilitate acquisition, retention, and transfer of cognitive skills.
“Research in cognitive skill training highlights the contributions of both explicit and implicit learning (i.e., learning with and without awareness/intention) [61,62], and identifies multiple training procedures which facilitate acquisition, retention, and transfer of cognitive skills.”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 171 · Cited by 399
- Authors
- Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C.
- Affiliations
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- ORCID
- Sun, Ron
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 159-192
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1997798784
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 32.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- skill acquisition, implicit learning, explicit learning, dual-process theory, synergistic effect, bottom-up approach, tacit knowledge, explicit knowledge
- MeSH terms
- Cognition, Humans, Learning, Models, Psychological, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review