The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading.
Open accessAbstract
A real-time visual processing theory is used to analyze real and illusory contour formation, contour and brightness interactions, neon color spreading, complementary color induction, and filling-in of discounted illuminants and scotomas. The theory also physically interprets and generalizes Land's retinex theory. These phenomena are traced to adaptive processes that overcome limitations of visual uptake to synthesize informative visual representations of the external world. Two parallel contour sensitive processes interact to generate the theory's brightness, color, and form estimates. A boundary contour process is sensitive to orientation and amount of contrast but not to direction of contrast in scenic edges. It synthesizes boundaries sensitive to the global configuration of scenic elements. A feature contour process is insensitive to orientation but sensitive to both amount of contrast and to direction of contrast in scenic edges. It triggers a diffusive filling-in of featural quality within perceptual domains whose boundaries are determined by completed boundary contours. The boundary contour process is hypothesized to include cortical interactions initiated by hypercolumns in Area 17 of the visual cortex. The feature contour process is hypothesized to include cortical interactions initiated by the cytochrome oxydase staining blobs in Area 17. Relevant data from striate and prestriate visual cortex, including data that support two predictions, are reviewed. Implications for other perceptual theories and axioms of geometry are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0085 · Cited by 2,608
Cited by
A massively parallel architecture for a self-organizing neural pattern recognition machine
Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1987) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(87)80014-2 · Cited by 2,525
Self-citationWagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0029333 · Cited by 1,539
Solving the “real” mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside memory
O'Regan, J. K. (1992) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0084327 · Cited by 997
The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy.
Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699938708408361 · Cited by 832
A theory of visual interpolation in object perception
Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90009-d · Cited by 710
Metadata
- Authors
- Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1985
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-211
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W1966433187
- Cited by
- 1,112
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0033-295x.92.2.173
- The paper
- Grossberg, S., & Mingolla, E. (1985). Neural dynamics of form perception: Boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychological Review. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.2.173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.