College men's affective reactions to individual therapy, psychoeducational workshops, and men's support group brochures: The influence of gender-role conflict and power dynamics upon help-seeking attitudes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Targeting men's conformity to traditional masculine stereotypes may elicit behavior change that extends to psychological help-seeking.
“targeting one’s conformity to traditional masculine stereotypes may elicit behavior change that extends to psychological help-seeking in men”
From Improving Mental Health Service Utilization Among Men: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Behavior Change Techniques Within Interventions Targeting Help-Seeking (2019) · cites this paper as Blazina & Marks, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Blazina, C., & Marks, L. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Houston (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Venue
- Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-305
- ISSN
- 0033-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1536
- OpenAlex
- W2036354243
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- men's mental health, help-seeking attitudes, gender role conflict, power relations, individual psychotherapy, psychoeducational workshops, male university students, affective reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
