The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vagal influence on working memory and attention
Hansen, A. L., Johnsen, B. H., & Thayer, J. F. (2003) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00073-4 · Cited by 759
On the Relationship between Task Performance and Associated Verbalizable Knowledge
Berry, D. C., & Broadbent, D. E. (1984) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748408402156 · Cited by 759
Exploratory consumer buying behavior: Conceptualization and measurement
Baumgartner, H., & Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1996) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/0167-8116(95)00037-2 · Cited by 586
Subjective health complaints in adolescence—Reliability and validity of survey methods
HAUGLAND, S., & WOLD, B. (2001) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1006/jado.2000.0393 · Cited by 465
The structure of employee attitudes to safety: A European example
Cox, S., & Cox, T. (1991) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678379108257007 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcnemar, Q.
- Venue
- Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews
- Publisher
- Portico
- Published
- 1967-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-94
- ISSN
- 0010-7549 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007988156
- Cited by
- 837
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/009024
- The paper
- Mcnemar, Q. (1967). Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1037/009024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
