Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance.
Abstract
We report two experiments that compare the performance of young and older adults on perceptual-motor tasks involving division of attention. Previous studies have shown older people to be especially penalized by divided attention situations, but the generality of this finding was recently challenged by Somberg and Salthouse (1982). The present study was conducted to investigate the possibility that age differences in dual-task performance are amplified by an increase in the difficulty of the constituent tasks, where difficulty was manipulated by varying the central, cognitive nature of the tasks (Experiment 1) or the degree of choice involved (Experiment 2). With the present tasks, strong evidence was found for an age-related decrement in divided attention performance. Contrary to our original expectations, however, it does not seem that division of attention presents some especial difficulty to older people. Rather, division of attention is one of several equivalent ways to increase overall task complexity. In turn, age differences are exaggerated as tasks are made more complex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In psychological literature, complexity and difficulty of tasks are often used interchangeably.
“Resulting flaws concerning information processing capacities emerge often in the psychological literature in which “complexity” and “difficulty” of tasks are used interchangeably (see for examples: Wood et al., 1987; McDowd and Craik, 1988).”
From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McDowd and Craik, 1988
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 394
- Authors
- McDowd, J. M., & Craik, F. I. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- ORCID
- Craik, Fergus I. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267-280
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2029442310
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- divided attention, aging, older adults, dual-task performance, task difficulty, perceptual-motor task, age differences, task complexity, cognitive load
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Choice Behavior, Concept Formation, Form Perception, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Speech Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review