Cited by 394Cognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance.

McDowd, Joan M., Craik, Fergus I. M.·1988·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

We report two experiments that compare the performance of young and older adults on perceptual-motor tasks involving division of attention. Previous studies have shown older people to be especially penalized by divided attention situations, but the generality of this finding was recently challenged by Somberg and Salthouse (1982). The present study was conducted to investigate the possibility that age differences in dual-task performance are amplified by an increase in the difficulty of the constituent tasks, where difficulty was manipulated by varying the central, cognitive nature of the tasks (Experiment 1) or the degree of choice involved (Experiment 2). With the present tasks, strong evidence was found for an age-related decrement in divided attention performance. Contrary to our original expectations, however, it does not seem that division of attention presents some especial difficulty to older people. Rather, division of attention is one of several equivalent ways to increase overall task complexity. In turn, age differences are exaggerated as tasks are made more complex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.14.2.267

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In psychological literature, complexity and difficulty of tasks are often used interchangeably.

    “Resulting flaws concerning information processing capacities emerge often in the psychological literature in which “complexity” and “difficulty” of tasks are used interchangeably (see for examples: Wood et al., 1987; McDowd and Craik, 1988).”

    From Human- versus Artificial Intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as McDowd and Craik, 1988

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 394

Authors
McDowd, J. M., & Craik, F. I. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
1988-05
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
267-280
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2029442310
Cited by
394
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
divided attention, aging, older adults, dual-task performance, task difficulty, perceptual-motor task, age differences, task complexity, cognitive load
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Choice Behavior, Concept Formation, Form Perception, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review