The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An audiovisual test of kinematic primitives for visual speech perception.
Abstract
Isolated kinematic properties of visible speech can provide information for lip reading. Kinematic facial information is isolated by darkening an actor's face and attaching dots to various articulators so that only moving dots can be seen with no facial features present. To test the salience of these images, the authors conducted experiments to determine whether the images could visually influence the perception of discrepant auditory syllables. Results showed that these images can influence auditory speech independently of the participant's knowledge of the stimuli. In other experiments, single frozen frames of visible syllables were presented with discrepant auditory syllables to test the salience of static facial features. Although the influence of the kinematic stimuli was perceptual, any influence of the static featural stimuli was likely based on participant's misunderstanding or postperceptual response bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“images that involve no identifiable facial features but that comprise only a few illuminated dots on a darkened face can also influence heard speech”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Rosenblum & Saldana, 1996
In the citing paper
“The latter study also revealed that visual influences can occur for observers who do not recognize the images as a face.”
From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Rosenblum & Saldana, 1996
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Calvert, G. A., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. J. (2000) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00513-3 · Cited by 954
The Natural Statistics of Audiovisual Speech
Chandrasekaran, C., Wieckowski, A. T., Stillittano, S., Caplier, A., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000436 · Cited by 648
The perception of emotions by ear and by eye
de Gelder, B., & Vroomen, J. (2000) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/026999300378824 · Cited by 657
Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perception
van Wassenhove, V., Grant, K. W., & Poeppel, D. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.001 · Cited by 649
Rosenblum, L. D., Schmuckler, M. A., & Johnson, J. A. (1997) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03211902 · Cited by 367
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenblum, L. D., & Saldaña, H. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 318-331
- ISSN
- 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1277
- OpenAlex
- W2093772147
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- lip reading, visible speech, articulator movement, moving dots, audiovisual speech perception, audiovisual integration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Lipreading, Male, Phonetics, Psychoacoustics, Speech Perception, Video Recording
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
