Attention and retrieval from long-term memory
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have revealed that interruption induces disruptive influences on the performance of cognitive tasks.
“Previous studies have revealed that interruption induces disruptive influences on the performance of cognitive tasks.”
From Effect of Redundant Haptic Information on Task Performance during Visuo-Tactile Task Interruption and Recovery (2016) · cites this paper as Baddeley et al., 1984
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 540
- Authors
- Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 518-540
- ISSN
- 0096-3445 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2222
- OpenAlex
- W1968579477
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology General (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- attention, long-term memory, memory retrieval, selective attention, memory search
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
