Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation.
Abstract
When disoriented in a closed rectangular tank, fish (Xenotoca eiseni) reoriented in accord with the large-scale shape of the environment, but they were also able to conjoin geometric information with nongeometric properties such as the color of a wall or the features provided by panels located at the corners of the tank. Fish encoded geometric information even when featural information sufficed to solve the spatial task. When tested after transformations that altered the original arrangement of the panels, fish were more affected by those transformations that modified the geometric relationship between the target and the shape of the environment. Finally, fish appeared unable to use nongeometric information provided by distant panels. These findings show that a reorientation mechanism based on geometry is widespread among vertebrates, though the joint use of geometric and nongeometric cues by fish suggest that the degree of information encapsulation of the mechanism varies considerably between species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of studies have demonstrated that teleost fish can rely on the geometry or global shape of the environmental boundaries and surfaces for orientation and navigation.
“a number of studies have demonstrated also that teleost fish can rely on the geometry or global shape of the environmental boundaries and surfaces for orientation and navigation”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
Like adult humans, monkeys, rats, and birds, teleost fish can use geometrical and non-geometrical information conjointly or alternatively depending on task requirements.
“like adult humans, monkeys, rats, and birds, teleost fish can use geometrical and non-geometrical information (i.e., the form or color of individual landmarks and surfaces), conjointly or alternatively depending on the task requirements”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [85]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 222
- Authors
- Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 199-210
- ISSN
- 0097-7403 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2184
- OpenAlex
- W2114341501
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 43.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Keywords
- spatial reorientation, geometric information, Xenotoca eiseni, fish navigation, color cues, transformation, information encapsulation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Color Perception, Discrimination Learning, Distance Perception, Escape Reaction, Female, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review