Cited by 388Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Relations between Pavlovian-instrumental transfer and reinforcer devaluation

Holland, Peter C.·2004·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Abstract

Relations between posttraining reinforcer devaluation and Pavlovian-instrumental transfer were examined in 2 experiments. When a single reinforcer was used, extended training of the instrumental response increased transfer but reduced devaluation effects. When multiple instrumental reinforcers were used, both reinforcer-specific transfer and devaluation effects were less influenced by the amount of instrumental training. Finally, although reinforcer devaluation decreased both Pavlovian conditioned responses and baseline instrumental responding, it had no effect on either single-reinforcer or reinforcer-specific transfer. These results indicate that transfer and reinforcer devaluation can reflect different aspects of associative learning and that the nature of associative learning can be influenced by parameters such as the amount of training and the use of multiple reinforcers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are dissociations between the effect of devaluation in instrumental responding versus PIT.

    “Further, there are dissociations between the effect of devaluation in instrumental responding versus PIT (Holland, 2004)”

    From Goals and Habits in the Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Holland, 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 388

Authors
Holland, P. C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Holland, Peter C.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
Published
2004
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
104-117
ISSN
  • 0097-7403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2184
OpenAlex
W2040774694
Cited by
388
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Behavior Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060179, MH 65879, R01MH065879, MH 60179)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer, reinforcer devaluation, instrumental responding, associative learning
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Association Learning, Conditioning, Operant, Cues, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Perception, Reinforcement, Psychology, Transfer, Psychology, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review