Cited by 52Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumReproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Health and Contraception

Life event stress and the association with spontaneous abortion in gravid women at an urban emergency department

Hamilton Boyles, Sarah, Ness, Roberta B., Grisso, Jeane Ann, Markovic, Nina, Bromberger, Joyce, CiFelli, Denise·2000·Health Psychology

Abstract

In this study, the authors hypothesized that life event stress is associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion. Using a nested case-control design in an emergency department (N = 970), stress was measured using a life event inventory and a sample drawn from R. B. Ness et al.'s (1999) Early Pregnancy Study. Gestational age at time of fetal loss served as a marker of chromosomal status. Women experiencing more than one life event used more alcohol and public assistance. Spontaneous abortion at 11 weeks or greater was associated with more life event stress (adjusted odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.4-6.2), whereas spontaneous abortion at any gestational age was not, implying that life event stress increases the risk of chromosomally normal spontaneous abortion. An analysis of confounders showed tobacco use was associated with an increased risk of spontaneous abortion, whereas prenatal care was only associated with fetal loss at 11 weeks or greater.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between female age and miscarriage risk is attributed to an age-related increase in the frequency of embryonic trisomies, particularly trisomy 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, and 22.

    “This association is attributed to an age-related increase in the frequency of embryonic trisomies, particularly trisomy 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, and 22. 60,61”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 52

Authors
Hamilton Boyles, S., Ness, R. B., Grisso, J. A., Markovic, N., Bromberger, J., & CiFelli, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2000-11
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
510-514
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2030307286
Cited by
52
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
life events, miscarriage, early pregnancy, chromosomal abnormalities, alcohol consumption, social assistance, tobacco use, prenatal care, emergency department patients
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Life Change Events, Pennsylvania, Pregnancy, Risk, Stress, Psychological, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review