Illness-specific catastrophic thinking and overperception in asthma.
Abstract
Objective This study investigated the role of illness-specific catastrophic thinking in symptom perception in asthma. Design and main outcome measures A total sample of 72 patients with intermittent to moderate persistent asthma completed the Catastrophizing about Asthma Scale and completed the Asthma Symptom Checklist to measure retrospective symptom reporting. In addition, symptoms were concurrently assessed during different respiratory challenges eliciting mild and ambiguous versus salient and pronounced symptoms. Results Catastrophic thinking in general, when patients are not having an exacerbation, is related to an increase in emotional symptoms, especially in ambiguous situations where respiratory difficulties could occur. Catastrophic thinking during exacerbations is related to an increase in emotional symptoms as well as in respiratory symptoms during respiratory challenges. Conclusion These strong relationships between catastrophic thinking and increased perception of asthma symptoms suggest a link between illness-specific catastrophic thinking and overperception. Consequently, catastrophic thoughts are an important target for psychological interventions in support of drug treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asthma-specific catastrophizing is associated with over-reporting of asthma symptoms.
“It has previously been shown that asthma-specific catastrophizing is associated with over-reporting of asthma symptoms (De Peuter, Lemaigre, Van Diest & Van den Bergh, 2008).”
From Exposure‐based cognitive behavior therapy for anxiety related to asthma: A feasibility study with multivariate baseline design. (2020) · cites this paper as De Peuter, Lemaigre, Van Diest & Van den Bergh, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- De Peuter, S., Lemaigre, V., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Health Psychology
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-99
- ISSN
- 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-7810
- OpenAlex
- W2055544970
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- asthma, catastrophic thinking, asthma exacerbations, emotional symptoms, respiratory challenge, psychological intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Asthma, Belgium, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review