Cited by 46Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMemory Processes and InfluencesSport Psychology and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Musical imagery: Generation of tones and chords

Hubbard, Timothy L., Stoeckig, Keiko·1988·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Four experiments are reported that examine subjects' ability to form and use images of tones and chords. In Experiments 1 and 3, subjects heard a cue tone or chord and formed an image of a tone or chord one whole step in pitch above the cue. This image was then compared to a probe tone or chord that was either the same as the image in pitch, different from the image in pitch and harmonically closely related, or different and harmonically distantly related. Image formation times and response times were measured. In Experiment 3 a random-tone mask was used to control for possible contribution of the cue in echoic memory. In both experiments tone images were formed faster than chord images, a result consistent with the idea of structural complexity as a determinant of image formation time. Response times and accuracy rates were found to parallel results found in music perception studies, results consistent with the idea of shared mechanisms in the processing of musical images and percepts. Experiments 2 and 4 were control experiments examining the possible influence of demand characteristics and subjects' knowledge. In experiment 2 subjects predicted the results of "an average person" using imagery, and in Experiment 4 subjects completed the task without receiving imagery instructions. The findings ruled out the possibility that demand characteristics and subjects' knowledge were solely responsible for the results of Experiments 1 and 3 and support the argument for the role of i…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.656

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex or multipart images take longer to generate than simple images, and this may be particularly the case for visual imagery in children.

    “Complex or multipart images are known to take longer to generate than simple images (Hubbard & Stoeckig, 1988; Kosslyn et al., 1983), and this may particularly be the case for visual imagery in children.”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Hubbard & Stoeckig, 1988

  • Generating inner speech "captured" the perception of ambiguous auditory sounds, suggesting the functioning of a forward model in shaping the perception of an incoming sensation.

    “In two experiments, Scott, Yeung, Gick, and Werker (2013) showed that generating inner speech “captured” the perception of ambiguous auditory sounds, suggesting the functioning of a forward model in shaping the perception of an incoming sensation, both when the vocalization was generated in inner speech and when it was silently mouthed (see Hubbard & Stoeckig, 1988, for a similar example of”

    From Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015) · cites this paper as Hubbard & Stoeckig, 1988

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hubbard, T. L., & Stoeckig, K.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Published
1988
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
656-667
ISSN
  • 0278-7393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1285
OpenAlex
W2142986070
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
musical imagery, structural complexity, pitch perception, harmonic relationships, echoic memory, demand characteristics, music perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Cues, Humans, Imagination, Music, Pitch Discrimination, Practice, Psychological, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review