Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?

Neill, W. Trammell, Valdes, Leslie A.·1992·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

Abstract

Responses to recently ignored stimuli may be slower and less accurate than responses to new stimuli. Neill and Westberry (1987) found that such negative priming effects dissipated within a 2-s interval between response and the next stimulus, the response-stimulus interval (RSI). However, experiments by Tipper, Weaver, Cameron, Brehaut, and Bastedo (1991) found negative priming persisted unchanged over RSIs from 1,350 to 6,600 ms. Our experiments used a letter-matching procedure in which target letters were flanked by irrelevant letters. Negative priming was manifested by longer reaction times and more errors to letters that had appeared as flankers in the preceding trial. RSI was varied from 500 to 8,000 ms.

Cites (9)

  1. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
    Stroop, J. R. · 1935 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  2. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory
    Shiffrin, Richard M., Schneider, Walter · 1977 · Psychological Review
  3. Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
    Atkinson, R.C., Shiffrin, R.M. · 1968 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  4. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
    Tulving, Endel, Thomson, Donald M. · 1973 · Psychological Review
  5. The information available in brief visual presentations
    Sperling, George · 1960 · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied
  6. Toward an instance theory of automatization.
    Logan, Gordon D. · 1988 · Psychological Review
  7. Short-term retention of individual verbal items.
    Peterson, Lloyd, Peterson, Margaret Jean · 1959 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  8. On data-limited and resource-limited processes
    Norman, Donald A, Bobrow, Daniel G · 1975 · Cognitive Psychology
  9. Components of attention
    Posner, Michael I., Boies, Stephen J. · 1971 · Psychological Review

Show all 9 references

Cited by (14)

  1. Load Theory of Selective Attention and Cognitive Control
    Lavie, Nilli, Hirst, Aleksandra, de Fockert, Jan W., Viding, Essi · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  2. Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention
    MacLeod, Colin M., MacDonald, Penny A. · 2000 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  3. Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.
    Anderson, Michael C., Neely, James H. · 1996 · Memory
  4. In Opposition to Inhibition
    MacLeod, Colin M, Dodd, Michael D, Sheard, Erin D, Wilson, Daryl E, Bibi, Uri · 2003 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation
  5. Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards
    Libera, Chiara Della, Chelazzi, Leonardo · 2006 · Psychological Science

See all 332

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0278-7393.18.3.565
The paper
Neill, W. T., & Valdes, L. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.18.3.565

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.